Nowadays, the best way to measure your Duolingo progress is using the path. This is probably why Duolingo stopped using them. The old Duolingo levels simply don’t correspond with things like the CEFR. It’s for these reasons that we can’t really find any parallels with the more accepted frames of reference. In fact, I’d say my Spanish is better than my French - yet the old Duolingo levels only have me at level 16! My French is absolutely nowhere near as good as my Italian.Ĭase in point: I spent a bit of time in Nice recently and, while I could understand a lot, I could only speak using basic sentences. My Italian is by far my best language and the only one (aside from English) I feel comfortable speaking. You’d think that my Italian, French and Russian are all at similar levels - but they’re really not. Not only is XP a poor measure of progress, the old levels also had a limit. However, I currently need 831 XP to move up to the top level in French, and 2556 XP to move up in Russian.Ĭrystal clear, right? Well, not really. No matter how much more XP I earn, I’ll remain at level 25. You’ll notice my Italian course is completely maxed out. ![]() ![]() As you can see, the levels are determined by how much XP you have in each language course.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |